How to Tell Wild Animals – Class 10 Quiz

No, ‘dyin’ and ‘lion’ do not have an exact rhyme in standard pronunciation. However, the poet uses a creative poetic device called slant rhyme or near rhyme. If pronounced casually or with a regional accent, "lion" can sound like "lyin’," making it rhyme with "dyin’." This playful use of language adds humor and rhythm to the poem.

The poet suggests that one can identify a lion by its majestic appearance and loud roar. If a large, tawny beast roars at you as you are dying, then it is a lion. Similarly, a tiger can be recognized by its black stripes on a yellow coat. According to the poet, you can identify a tiger when it leaps on you and eats you up. The poet humorously implies that recognizing these wild animals happens at the cost of one’s own life, adding a playful tone to the poem.

No, “lept” and “lep” are not spelt correctly according to standard English rules. The poet intentionally uses these non-standard spellings to capture a colloquial tone and mimic informal speech. This playful deviation adds humor and rhythm to the poem, enhancing its lighthearted and ironic style. By altering the spelling, the poet not only draws attention to the casual nature of the narrative but also emphasizes the absurdity of the situations described. This creative use of language invites readers to enjoy the poem’s unique voice and quirky charm.

Yes, many languages, including English and Marathi, have expressions inspired by wild animals. In English, phrases like “bear hug,” “crocodile tears,” and even “hyena laughter” link animal behavior to human traits, often humorously or ironically. In Marathi, there are similar idioms where animals symbolize specific qualities. For instance, a lion (शेर) might represent strength or dominance, and phrases involving tigers (वाघ) or monkeys (माकड) are used to describe behavior or situations. These expressions enrich our language by drawing on popular ideas about wild animals and their perceived characteristics.

The line “A novice might nonplus” would be more conventionally written as “A novice might be nonplussed.” However, the poet’s choice to drop “be” and use “nonplus” as a verb is a deliberate, creative twist. This unconventional usage adds a playful, dynamic quality to the line and enhances the poem’s unique voice. It also creates a more active image, as if the novice’s confusion is an action in itself, which aligns with the poet's overall style of bending language rules for stylistic effect and to engage the reader.

Yes, many poets take creative liberties with language to enhance their work’s impact and humor. For example, in English, poets like e.e. cummings play with syntax and punctuation, often writing in lower case and using unconventional structures. Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky” is another great example, where invented words create a whimsical, playful effect. In Marathi, poets sometimes use colloquial expressions and playful wordplay to add humor. Humorous poems, like those found in Marathi folk literature, often bend language rules and use puns to create a light, engaging tone that resonates with everyday experiences.

One of the lines I especially enjoy is “A novice might nonplus.” The poet’s decision to use “nonplus” as a verb, rather than the grammatically conventional “be nonplussed,” is delightfully playful. This unexpected twist creates humor by bending language rules in a way that energizes the poem. I also appreciate how the poet assigns human traits to animals—like hyenas laughing or crocodiles weeping—which adds to the funny, imaginative imagery. These creative language choices not only evoke laughter but also highlight the flexible and inventive nature of poetic expression.